<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for unsaturated.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unsaturated.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unsaturated.com</link>
	<description>The personal and professional website of Matthew Crumley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 04:07:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on SpamAssassin Changes for Dreamhost by matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.unsaturated.com/projects/spamassassin-changes-for-dreamhost/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 04:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unsaturated.com/?p=303#comment-79</guid>
		<description>The hassles were too many and kludges too cumbersome.  I moved my mail to Google.  Read about it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unsaturated.com/projects/the-last-spam/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;in my blog&lt;/a&gt;.  I really appreciate all the feedback.  Maybe DH will find a way to enhance their spam filtering but it seems unlikely to happen anytime soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hassles were too many and kludges too cumbersome.  I moved my mail to Google.  Read about it <a href="http://www.unsaturated.com/projects/the-last-spam/" rel="nofollow">in my blog</a>.  I really appreciate all the feedback.  Maybe DH will find a way to enhance their spam filtering but it seems unlikely to happen anytime soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I-797, Notice of Action (Approved) by nui</title>
		<link>http://www.unsaturated.com/immigration/i-797-notice-of-action-approved/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>nui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unsaturated.com/i-797-notice-of-action-approved/#comment-78</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand I notice I-797 2006 but I didn&#039;t passed. What was happen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand I notice I-797 2006 but I didn&#8217;t passed. What was happen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Web-Enabled, Automated Horse Feeder by Debra</title>
		<link>http://www.unsaturated.com/projects/web-enabled-automated-horse-feeder/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Debra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unsaturated.com/projects/web-enabled-automated-horse-feeder/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>I love it,I boyfriend had thought one,so I went looking to see if someone allready did and of course someone did.Shame,but it&#039;s great when I get a down payment for my little ranch,I&#039;m going to look into your feeders again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it,I boyfriend had thought one,so I went looking to see if someone allready did and of course someone did.Shame,but it&#8217;s great when I get a down payment for my little ranch,I&#8217;m going to look into your feeders again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I-797C, Notice of Action by tautapu</title>
		<link>http://www.unsaturated.com/immigration/i-797c-notice-of-action-3/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>tautapu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 03:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unsaturated.com/i-797c-notice-of-action-3/#comment-74</guid>
		<description>im recently on maui, hawaii. i&#039;ve received my notice of action from salt lake city, where my sponsors at, were still trying to get there.
it says that i should hear from them within 30 days starting from the 19 of november 2008.
the problem is i keep calling my sponsor but i could not get in touch with them and i need to know whether you&#039;ve sent my green cards over or no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im recently on maui, hawaii. i&#8217;ve received my notice of action from salt lake city, where my sponsors at, were still trying to get there.<br />
it says that i should hear from them within 30 days starting from the 19 of november 2008.<br />
the problem is i keep calling my sponsor but i could not get in touch with them and i need to know whether you&#8217;ve sent my green cards over or no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I-797C, Notice of Action by marcos</title>
		<link>http://www.unsaturated.com/immigration/i-797c-notice-of-action-3/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>marcos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unsaturated.com/i-797c-notice-of-action-3/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>i jus received the i- 797c. what does it mean? is it that i will get my green card?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i jus received the i- 797c. what does it mean? is it that i will get my green card?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I-797C, Notice of Action by yoon hee kang</title>
		<link>http://www.unsaturated.com/immigration/i-797c-notice-of-action-3/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>yoon hee kang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unsaturated.com/i-797c-notice-of-action-3/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>I have recieved I-797C, Notice of Action.
I would like to know what steps are left after having this paper.
Thanks,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have recieved I-797C, Notice of Action.<br />
I would like to know what steps are left after having this paper.<br />
Thanks,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I-797C, Notice of Action by Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.unsaturated.com/immigration/i-797c-notice-of-action-3/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unsaturated.com/i-797c-notice-of-action-3/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>I am interpeting for an indivual, he has recived an I-797C Notice of Action form along with a letter from the USIC  stating that his case is a Marriage Sham.  At this time the case is closed, what further action does this indivual must do in order to re-open the case or start a new application process? please help thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am interpeting for an indivual, he has recived an I-797C Notice of Action form along with a letter from the USIC  stating that his case is a Marriage Sham.  At this time the case is closed, what further action does this indivual must do in order to re-open the case or start a new application process? please help thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I-797C, Notice of Action by Shailesh</title>
		<link>http://www.unsaturated.com/immigration/i-797c-notice-of-action-3/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Shailesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unsaturated.com/i-797c-notice-of-action-3/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>I came with my wife and two son on 14 Nov 08 on immgrant s visa which I got in Diversity visa Lotterey 

We 3  got letter Notice of Action and green card. But my elder son 20 years yet not recved Notice of Action or I 797C or green card What to do pls advised</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came with my wife and two son on 14 Nov 08 on immgrant s visa which I got in Diversity visa Lotterey </p>
<p>We 3  got letter Notice of Action and green card. But my elder son 20 years yet not recved Notice of Action or I 797C or green card What to do pls advised</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SpamAssassin Changes for Dreamhost by Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.unsaturated.com/projects/spamassassin-changes-for-dreamhost/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unsaturated.com/?p=303#comment-69</guid>
		<description>I got a response saying that they don&#039;t care if I don&#039;t like it and that I&#039;m out of luck if I want to see their list of domains they are blocking.  Since this is a serious issue and I&#039;m sure is one of many to come, I&#039;ve created a mailing list to discuss this and other issues since there seem to be an assortment of blogs may or maynot be watched by all those interested.  If you want to subscribe, the list is here;

http://lists.datasmuggler.com/listinfo.cgi/dhprocmailusers-datasmuggler.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a response saying that they don&#8217;t care if I don&#8217;t like it and that I&#8217;m out of luck if I want to see their list of domains they are blocking.  Since this is a serious issue and I&#8217;m sure is one of many to come, I&#8217;ve created a mailing list to discuss this and other issues since there seem to be an assortment of blogs may or maynot be watched by all those interested.  If you want to subscribe, the list is here;</p>
<p><a href="http://lists.datasmuggler.com/listinfo.cgi/dhprocmailusers-datasmuggler.com" rel="nofollow">http://lists.datasmuggler.com/listinfo.cgi/dhprocmailusers-datasmuggler.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SpamAssassin Changes for Dreamhost by Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.unsaturated.com/projects/spamassassin-changes-for-dreamhost/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unsaturated.com/?p=303#comment-68</guid>
		<description>So here is my response:

&quot;It looks like that our system will not allow messages sent from ebay,
paypal to be resent because our system shows that the message can be
considered &quot;phishing&quot;.

We have specific restrictions such as this to prevent phishing scams.


I would suggest setting up a new email address for paypal and ebay and
don&#039;t forward that address to the shell just add a separate filter from
the panel to discard everything that doesn&#039;t come from Ebay/Paypal.

Or, you can even add a new filter that comes before the forward to shell
and that would send any ebay/paypal messages to another folder and select
the &quot;execute and stop&quot; for that filter.&quot;

I&#039;m not giving up yet...

My response:

It looks like that our system will not allow messages sent from ebay,
paypal to be resent because our system shows that the message can be
considered &quot;phishing&quot;.

We have specific restrictions such as this to prevent phishing scams.


I would suggest setting up a new email address for paypal and ebay and
don&#039;t forward that address to the shell just add a separate filter from
the panel to discard everything that doesn&#039;t come from Ebay/Paypal.

Or, you can even add a new filter that comes before the forward to shell
and that would send any ebay/paypal messages to another folder and select
the &quot;execute and stop&quot; for that filter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So here is my response:</p>
<p>&#8220;It looks like that our system will not allow messages sent from ebay,<br />
paypal to be resent because our system shows that the message can be<br />
considered &#8220;phishing&#8221;.</p>
<p>We have specific restrictions such as this to prevent phishing scams.</p>
<p>I would suggest setting up a new email address for paypal and ebay and<br />
don&#8217;t forward that address to the shell just add a separate filter from<br />
the panel to discard everything that doesn&#8217;t come from Ebay/Paypal.</p>
<p>Or, you can even add a new filter that comes before the forward to shell<br />
and that would send any ebay/paypal messages to another folder and select<br />
the &#8220;execute and stop&#8221; for that filter.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not giving up yet&#8230;</p>
<p>My response:</p>
<p>It looks like that our system will not allow messages sent from ebay,<br />
paypal to be resent because our system shows that the message can be<br />
considered &#8220;phishing&#8221;.</p>
<p>We have specific restrictions such as this to prevent phishing scams.</p>
<p>I would suggest setting up a new email address for paypal and ebay and<br />
don&#8217;t forward that address to the shell just add a separate filter from<br />
the panel to discard everything that doesn&#8217;t come from Ebay/Paypal.</p>
<p>Or, you can even add a new filter that comes before the forward to shell<br />
and that would send any ebay/paypal messages to another folder and select<br />
the &#8220;execute and stop&#8221; for that filter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SpamAssassin Changes for Dreamhost by Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.unsaturated.com/projects/spamassassin-changes-for-dreamhost/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unsaturated.com/?p=303#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Brian/Others:

I just ran into this issue too.  I WAS getting emails from ebay until 12/4, however I am not getting these now.  I&#039;m now getting bounces for anything sent from ebay when I try to procmail and forward. This is seriously getting out of control.  I am month to month now so I may just have to bail.  DH you need to fix this.

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian/Others:</p>
<p>I just ran into this issue too.  I WAS getting emails from ebay until 12/4, however I am not getting these now.  I&#8217;m now getting bounces for anything sent from ebay when I try to procmail and forward. This is seriously getting out of control.  I am month to month now so I may just have to bail.  DH you need to fix this.</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SpamAssassin Changes for Dreamhost by KRKeegan</title>
		<link>http://www.unsaturated.com/projects/spamassassin-changes-for-dreamhost/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>KRKeegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 03:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unsaturated.com/?p=303#comment-66</guid>
		<description>There is a major flaw with this setup and any setup which uses a user account to process mail and then forward back to a mail account.

The procmail install on the user machines blocks forwarding for large institutional domain names, such as paypal, ebay, schwab, etc.  This is done to prevent phisers from using Dreamhost to solicit information.  However, it has the very unfortunate side effect of bouncing all mail from these sites.

I have been haggling with dreamhost for weeks and they just finally figured it out and set me this response:

-----

Hello, 

I&#039;m a little surprised that Andrea missed this, the problem here, is that you have &quot;ebay&quot; in a &quot;from&quot; header. The server then responds: 

Error: No mail with this sender address allowed (in reply to end of DATA command) 

Basically, we have a pretty blunt instrument on the web server side, that blocks mail with any &quot;from&quot; headers that contain known domains like &quot;ebay&quot;, &quot;paypal&quot;, &quot;bankofamerica&quot;, stuff like that. 

Since we&#039;re now asking users to send through the web servers, we may need to look into lifting those restrictions, however, that&#039;s what&#039;s happening at this time, and why you&#039;re getting that bounce. 

Again, I&#039;ll bring this to the attention of our administration, but for now, we can&#039;t remove that restriction without review. 

Sorry about that! 

Thanks! 
Brian H 

-------

Well thanks Brian for telling me.  But hey could you be a little more cavalier about bouncing what is essentially my most important emails.  (sarcasm)

So what I did in the mean time is to setup the following procmail filter:

:0
* ^From: MAILER-DAEMON@olds.dreamhost.com
$HOME/Maildir/

And then offlineimap syncs these emails over eventually.  So much for instant email.

This is obviously less than ideal.  And I hope Dreamhost fixes this ASAP.  I suggested they look into allowing forwarding of these domains to DH servers only.  This would still provide protection while allowing procmail to function.

Ugh, thanks DH for dropping the ball . . . again.(also sarcasm)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a major flaw with this setup and any setup which uses a user account to process mail and then forward back to a mail account.</p>
<p>The procmail install on the user machines blocks forwarding for large institutional domain names, such as paypal, ebay, schwab, etc.  This is done to prevent phisers from using Dreamhost to solicit information.  However, it has the very unfortunate side effect of bouncing all mail from these sites.</p>
<p>I have been haggling with dreamhost for weeks and they just finally figured it out and set me this response:</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Hello, </p>
<p>I&#8217;m a little surprised that Andrea missed this, the problem here, is that you have &#8220;ebay&#8221; in a &#8220;from&#8221; header. The server then responds: </p>
<p>Error: No mail with this sender address allowed (in reply to end of DATA command) </p>
<p>Basically, we have a pretty blunt instrument on the web server side, that blocks mail with any &#8220;from&#8221; headers that contain known domains like &#8220;ebay&#8221;, &#8220;paypal&#8221;, &#8220;bankofamerica&#8221;, stuff like that. </p>
<p>Since we&#8217;re now asking users to send through the web servers, we may need to look into lifting those restrictions, however, that&#8217;s what&#8217;s happening at this time, and why you&#8217;re getting that bounce. </p>
<p>Again, I&#8217;ll bring this to the attention of our administration, but for now, we can&#8217;t remove that restriction without review. </p>
<p>Sorry about that! </p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
Brian H </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Well thanks Brian for telling me.  But hey could you be a little more cavalier about bouncing what is essentially my most important emails.  (sarcasm)</p>
<p>So what I did in the mean time is to setup the following procmail filter:</p>
<p>:0<br />
* ^From: <a href="mailto:MAILER-DAEMON@olds.dreamhost.com">MAILER-DAEMON@olds.dreamhost.com</a><br />
$HOME/Maildir/</p>
<p>And then offlineimap syncs these emails over eventually.  So much for instant email.</p>
<p>This is obviously less than ideal.  And I hope Dreamhost fixes this ASAP.  I suggested they look into allowing forwarding of these domains to DH servers only.  This would still provide protection while allowing procmail to function.</p>
<p>Ugh, thanks DH for dropping the ball . . . again.(also sarcasm)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SpamAssassin Changes for Dreamhost by Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.unsaturated.com/projects/spamassassin-changes-for-dreamhost/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unsaturated.com/?p=303#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Dallas, I&#039;m sure you have your reasons, but the day I can&#039;t run procmail, I&#039;m no longer a dreamhost customer.  Your mail filters are fine for my grandma, but they don&#039;t cut it for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dallas, I&#8217;m sure you have your reasons, but the day I can&#8217;t run procmail, I&#8217;m no longer a dreamhost customer.  Your mail filters are fine for my grandma, but they don&#8217;t cut it for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SpamAssassin Changes for Dreamhost by Dallas</title>
		<link>http://www.unsaturated.com/projects/spamassassin-changes-for-dreamhost/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 01:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unsaturated.com/?p=303#comment-64</guid>
		<description>@Dan Giving users shell accounts on the mail servers would be a big step backwards for us.  Getting user-run processes OFF of the mail servers is one of the main reasons for this change, in addition to the improved data storage isolation.

@STEREO The new servers perform better due to less random stuff running on them as well as better performance from the data storage due to less resource contention from other servers (ie the web servers).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dan Giving users shell accounts on the mail servers would be a big step backwards for us.  Getting user-run processes OFF of the mail servers is one of the main reasons for this change, in addition to the improved data storage isolation.</p>
<p>@STEREO The new servers perform better due to less random stuff running on them as well as better performance from the data storage due to less resource contention from other servers (ie the web servers).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I-797C, Notice of Action by Aparecido C. Santos</title>
		<link>http://www.unsaturated.com/immigration/i-797c-notice-of-action-3/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Aparecido C. Santos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unsaturated.com/i-797c-notice-of-action-3/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>I recive an I- 797C saying that they apvove my case, also i have done the fingerprints and photos but i still haven&#039;t got my green card. It was apvove on March 31 2006.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recive an I- 797C saying that they apvove my case, also i have done the fingerprints and photos but i still haven&#8217;t got my green card. It was apvove on March 31 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SpamAssassin Changes for Dreamhost by STEREO</title>
		<link>http://www.unsaturated.com/projects/spamassassin-changes-for-dreamhost/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>STEREO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unsaturated.com/?p=303#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Email became faster?
Couldn&#039;t that be due to massive base of custom SA installations been disabled?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Email became faster?<br />
Couldn&#8217;t that be due to massive base of custom SA installations been disabled?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SpamAssassin Changes for Dreamhost by matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.unsaturated.com/projects/spamassassin-changes-for-dreamhost/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unsaturated.com/?p=303#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tips, Anders.  I didn&#039;t know about the SMTP quota.  I&#039;ll try your suggestions and update my tutorial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tips, Anders.  I didn&#8217;t know about the SMTP quota.  I&#8217;ll try your suggestions and update my tutorial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SpamAssassin Changes for Dreamhost by Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.unsaturated.com/projects/spamassassin-changes-for-dreamhost/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unsaturated.com/?p=303#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting this up, a nice tutorial.  I understand Dreamhosts reason for breaking up email, but what I don&#039;t understand is getting 72 hours notice.  While this is pretty easy to understand for someone who has been doing this for a while, its definately not for the beginner.  It is also not very clean.  The right answer is to give us accounts on both mail and web hosts.   Dreamhost SUCKS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this up, a nice tutorial.  I understand Dreamhosts reason for breaking up email, but what I don&#8217;t understand is getting 72 hours notice.  While this is pretty easy to understand for someone who has been doing this for a while, its definately not for the beginner.  It is also not very clean.  The right answer is to give us accounts on both mail and web hosts.   Dreamhost SUCKS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SpamAssassin Changes for Dreamhost by Anders Liljeqvist</title>
		<link>http://www.unsaturated.com/projects/spamassassin-changes-for-dreamhost/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Anders Liljeqvist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unsaturated.com/?p=303#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Great tutorial, I just used it to get my own spamfilters working again.

One thing worth pointing out is that users might want to avoid setups with excessive forwarding between mail accounts. Dreamhost have an SMTP quota that allows no more than 100 emails / hour.  If users are not careful, it is easy to end up doing more than 100 forwards an hour, with a bounce loop as result. The smtp server will reject the 101th email going back to your spam_checker_passed@ and send it back to the spam_checker@ account which in turn tries to forward the bounce to spam_checker_passed@, creating a loop.

To break such forwarding loops, users might want to add an X-Loop header before the email forward in .procmailrc. In my case, I added this recipe to .procmailrc just before the forward to spam_checker_passed@.

:0fw
&#124; formail -A &quot;X-Loop: loop_alert@liljeqvist.com&quot;
 
I search all incoming emails for that X-Loop header to detect and break any loops. Here is one of my first procmail recipes:

# If we find an X-loop, then it is a bounce.
:0
* ^X-Loop: loop_alert@liljeqvist.com
$MAILDIR/.LoopProblems/

I want to create backups of all emails but do not want to forward the backup copies to my main account. Instead I create a backup copy of each email in a folder called ShortTermArchive. I then sync this to my mail server using offlineimap. I also want to copy any bounce emails across, so must therefore sync several folders using offlineimap. To synchronise more than one folder, write something like this in .offlineimaprc:

folderfilter = lambda foldername: foldername in [&#039;INBOX.ProbablySpam&#039;,&#039;INBOX.ShortTermArchive&#039;,&#039;INBOX.LoopProblems&#039;]

(Here, I sync three folders called ProbablySpam, ShortTermArchive and LoopProblems).

Again, nice tutorial.

Cheers,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great tutorial, I just used it to get my own spamfilters working again.</p>
<p>One thing worth pointing out is that users might want to avoid setups with excessive forwarding between mail accounts. Dreamhost have an SMTP quota that allows no more than 100 emails / hour.  If users are not careful, it is easy to end up doing more than 100 forwards an hour, with a bounce loop as result. The smtp server will reject the 101th email going back to your spam_checker_passed@ and send it back to the spam_checker@ account which in turn tries to forward the bounce to spam_checker_passed@, creating a loop.</p>
<p>To break such forwarding loops, users might want to add an X-Loop header before the email forward in .procmailrc. In my case, I added this recipe to .procmailrc just before the forward to spam_checker_passed@.</p>
<p>:0fw<br />
| formail -A &#8220;X-Loop: <a href="mailto:loop_alert@liljeqvist.com">loop_alert@liljeqvist.com</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>I search all incoming emails for that X-Loop header to detect and break any loops. Here is one of my first procmail recipes:</p>
<p># If we find an X-loop, then it is a bounce.<br />
:0<br />
* ^X-Loop: <a href="mailto:loop_alert@liljeqvist.com">loop_alert@liljeqvist.com</a><br />
$MAILDIR/.LoopProblems/</p>
<p>I want to create backups of all emails but do not want to forward the backup copies to my main account. Instead I create a backup copy of each email in a folder called ShortTermArchive. I then sync this to my mail server using offlineimap. I also want to copy any bounce emails across, so must therefore sync several folders using offlineimap. To synchronise more than one folder, write something like this in .offlineimaprc:</p>
<p>folderfilter = lambda foldername: foldername in ['INBOX.ProbablySpam','INBOX.ShortTermArchive','INBOX.LoopProblems']</p>
<p>(Here, I sync three folders called ProbablySpam, ShortTermArchive and LoopProblems).</p>
<p>Again, nice tutorial.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I-797C, Notice of Action by matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.unsaturated.com/immigration/i-797c-notice-of-action-3/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 02:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unsaturated.com/i-797c-notice-of-action-3/#comment-58</guid>
		<description>@nay - All letters from the government arrive via first class (regular) mail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@nay &#8211; All letters from the government arrive via first class (regular) mail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
